Laptop for Third-World Countries |
I really like the concept of making a product that can improve the life of the consumer and the world. Both Jeff and Dr. Walls noted that it is important to make products that are beneficial and do not merely add more unnecessary things to someone’s life. The world today, and particularly the U.S., is presented with so many choices in even the smallest of things, such as what soap to buy. I believe it is imperative that companies begin focusing on the effect a product can have on the world. Fortunately, the whole idea behind design philosophy is to improve a product and make it more beneficial for everyone. By placing more emphasis on the design aspect, companies can begin to narrow down their products to become more simplistic, less wasteful and more beneficial.
A somewhat conflicting idea is the design for the majority of the population. Nevertheless, the majority of the products made cater to only 10% of the world’s population, and that is where the most money is made and where the new technology takes us. I don’t believe that companies should completely abandon that market segment because I feel that it helps us grow more in product development. However, companies can easily get caught up in making the most money possible through the 10%. I agree with Jeff’s statement that a business’s success will soon be as equally important as the social benefit it provides. While business success and social benefit had been separate at one point in time, the two will soon become interchangeable. It is a growing trend as well a possible necessity in the future of the market. Likewise, the growing technology has the ability to produce products that can benefit the rest of the population. If the majority of the world’s population is in poverty, it would be unsustainable if companies didn’t use their abilities to the benefit of society.
Dieter Rams product-left, Apple product-right |
One thing I found interesting from both the reading and the lecture: Apple was mentioned to be one of the company’s most successful in design and customer insights. Apple has constantly held a competitive advantage by coming out with products that have ‘wowed’ consumers. As Dr. Walls stated, you know a product is brilliant when people ask themselves, ‘why have they not thought of this before?’ Apple is always one of the first companies to think of products and has taken leaping strides in technology advancement. They have studied the market carefully to discover the true wants and needs of consumers. It is evident in the creative design of their products that they cater to the consumers. Among the philosophies mentioned earlier, they are loyal to the universal design and the design for simplicity. Apple products do not contain an instruction manual because the product is designed in a user-friendly fashion that anyone should be able to figure out. Likewise, the design of the products is simplistic and basic-exactly what consumers want and need. The idea of simplicity is based off of the works from the designer Dieter Rams. One can even see the similarities between the products from the two.
Meagan,
ReplyDeleteThank you for the first post! You nicely summarize and integrate what you’ve learned in the class and your thoughts on examples. I’m glad that you realized finding consumer’s needs and wants is important process. Also I enjoyed reading your thoughts on the design for the majority of the population. I agree that “while business success and social benefit had been separate at one point in time, the two will soon become interchangeable.” For the next post, my only suggestion is that you find and include examples which are not discussed in the class with your original thoughts. Other than that, Megan’s Insights looks just fine.